Two small European services, neither of which has ever been audited by an outside firm, both asking to be trusted on evidence of a different kind. The kinds are not equally strong.
Two answers to a question neither has been asked formally
OVPN's answer is a court case. In 2020 a court demanded customer data and the company had none to give; it fought the injunction and won on exactly that basis. It builds and owns its servers, runs them without disks, and carries insurance specifically to fund defending a legal demand, which is an unusual line item and a revealing one.
AirVPN's answer is continuous disclosure: open-source clients and a live public monitor showing what every server is doing at any moment. That is more visibility into day-to-day operation than almost anything here offers, and it is not the same as a demand arriving and going away empty.
A court case that already happened outranks a monitor that shows what is happening now, because the question is what the company does when compelled.
Who owns each of them
OVPN was acquired in May 2023 by an American group now trading as Point Wild, which sells several other VPN brands including Hotspot Shield — a service with no independent audit and a kill switch that let unencrypted traffic past during a crash. The 2020 court case happened under the previous owner and remains true; the company that would answer a demand tomorrow is a different one.
AirVPN is AirVPN di Paolo Brini, registered in Perugia, and is owned by the person whose name is on it.
Both are inside the fourteen-country intelligence agreement — Italy and Sweden — so neither is helped by its address.
On product, OVPN has a kill switch, multi-hop, ad blocking, memory-only servers, obfuscation and streaming support, and allows four devices on the monthly plan. AirVPN has port forwarding, ad blocking, obfuscation, a route into Tor and IPv6 protection, includes everything on every plan, and takes no email address — but has no iPhone or iPad app at all, and Italian residents may not use it.
OVPN is the quicker of the two; AirVPN measures at the slower end of everything here.
Which should you choose?
Choose OVPN if the 2020 court case is what convinces you and the change of ownership does not, or if you need an Apple device covered.
Choose AirVPN if independence from a larger group matters, you want port forwarding included, and there is no iPhone to cover.

AirVPN
Run by people who publish everything and market nothing.

OVPN
Fought an information injunction in court and won on having no logs.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench used for most entries here. BleepingComputer recorded a 220 Mbps global download average in August 2023 on a 5 Gbps test line, and that figure is now three years old
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
AirVPN
OVPN
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving AirVPN or OVPN.
Comparison


Mullvad vs AirVPN
Both take no email address and publish their source. Mullvad has been audited repeatedly and raided without loss; AirVPN has never been audited at all.
Comparison


Mullvad vs OVPN
Two Swedish services whose no-logs claims were both tested for real — one by a police search, the other in court. Neither lost anything.
Comparison


Windscribe vs AirVPN
Two independent services with opposite records on transparency, compared on audits, kill-switch testing and what each discloses when something goes wrong.
Comparison


IVPN vs OVPN
IVPN takes no email address and never raises its price. OVPN fought a court order in 2020 and had no data to give. Neither has a current audit.
Comparison


IVPN vs AirVPN
Two small European services that take no email address and sell by the week. Neither has a current audit; one has never had any audit at all.