These two are unusual in the same direction: both publish open-source clients, both refuse the upsell tactics the category runs on, and both would rather explain a limitation than hide it. Choosing between them comes down to which kind of evidence you weigh more.
An audit habit against an account that does not exist
Outside auditors have inspected Proton VPN's servers five years running, most recently June 2026. That is the most consistent inspection record on this site.
IVPN's is not comparable. Cure53's May 2025 audit covered the email and DNS side services; the VPN gateways were last examined in February 2023, and the no-logs claim itself was last looked at by an outside firm in 2019. What IVPN offers instead is structural: an account is a random number with no email address and no password, it takes cash, and every client is open source.
Gibraltar is an odd jurisdiction to reason about. It is inside the five-country arrangement through Britain, but has no interception law and no intelligence service of its own. Proton VPN sits in Geneva, outside every agreement, which is the simpler answer.
What each one includes without charging extra
IVPN puts multi-hop on its cheapest plan and never raises the price at renewal, and it sells by the week if you want a VPN for a trip rather than a year. It has no port forwarding on any plan, caps the entry plan at five devices, has no Apple TV app, and its Android build does not run on Amazon's fork of Android.
Proton VPN includes port forwarding, allows ten devices, and has a free plan with no data cap and no expiry, so you can test it without paying. Its weakness is speed: it is the slowest service measured here to start loading a page, and on calls that shows.
Which should you choose?
Choose Proton VPN if a current, repeated audit is the thing you are buying, or if you want port forwarding, more devices, or a free tier to try first. Choose IVPN if signing up without an identity matters more than audit currency, or if a weekly plan suits how you actually travel.
If you want both the anonymous signup and the recent evidence, Mullvad has the stronger audit record of the two anonymous options here.

Proton VPN
A free tier with no data cap, no expiry and no card required.

IVPN
No email address, no upsells, and public arguments against its own industry.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
Proton VPN
IVPN
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Proton VPN or IVPN.
Comparison


NordVPN vs Proton VPN
One of these you can use indefinitely without paying or handing over a card. The other has been audited more times but keeps the report behind the paywall.
Comparison


Mullvad vs IVPN
The two services that refuse to ask who you are. They differ on what an outsider has actually examined, and on how many devices you get.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs Proton VPN
ExpressVPN is the quicker connection by a clear margin. Proton VPN is the one whose apps you can read and whose free tier never expires.
Comparison


IVPN vs OVPN
IVPN takes no email address and never raises its price. OVPN fought a court order in 2020 and had no data to give. Neither has a current audit.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs CyberGhost
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and its apps are open. CyberGhost has streaming servers and a parent company it does not name.
Comparison


IVPN vs AirVPN
Two small European services that take no email address and sell by the week. Neither has a current audit; one has never had any audit at all.