As with ExpressVPN against CyberGhost, the first thing to establish here is not a feature. Kape Technologies owns both of these products. Private Internet Access states it. CyberGhost's site does not mention it anywhere.
The same owner, and only one disclosure
If you shortlisted several VPNs and these two came up, you have one company's opinion twice. That is not a security problem and neither product is worse for it, but it changes what the shortlist was for, and it is better known now than after you have paid.
The disclosure gap matters on its own terms. A company that does not tell you who owns it has made a decision about what you are entitled to know, and you can reasonably extend that judgement to things you cannot check as easily.
What one publishes and the other sells
Every Private Internet Access app is open source on every platform, so the software's behaviour can be verified outside the company. CyberGhost's are closed. Private Internet Access also has port forwarding, multi-hop, a SOCKS5 proxy and obfuscation; CyberGhost has none of those four, and the missing obfuscation means any network filtering VPN traffic stops CyberGhost outright.
Private Internet Access renews its three-year plan at the rate it charged. CyberGhost bills twenty-six months and then twelve, which is a different shape of surprise and the same one.
CyberGhost's genuine advantage is streaming: servers picked for particular services and a Smart DNS for televisions that cannot run an app. Private Internet Access does not sell that, and its kill switch allowed traffic through after a restart under testing where CyberGhost's held.
Which should you choose?
Choose Private Internet Access if you want readable source, obfuscation, port forwarding or a price that does not jump — which is most reasons somebody compares these two at all. Choose CyberGhost if a television is the device that matters and your network does not filter anything.
If what you wanted from this comparison was two independent options, the useful next step is to compare either one against a company Kape does not own. Proton VPN and Windscribe are both owned by the companies whose names are on them.

CyberGhost
Long terms, a Deloitte report, and a parent company it never mentions.

Private Internet Access
Open-source apps, unlimited devices, and a US address.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench used for most entries here; AllAboutCookies recorded an 18% average loss across four regions in January 2026, which ranks it alongside the middle of the field
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
CyberGhost
Private Internet Access
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving CyberGhost or Private Internet Access.
Comparison


NordVPN vs CyberGhost
CyberGhost is cheaper and has more streaming servers. NordVPN can hide that you are using a VPN at all, and says who owns it.
Comparison


Private Internet Access vs IPVanish
Two United States services whose no-logs promises were both tested by real legal demands. One produced nothing. The other produced records.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs CyberGhost
These are sold as competitors and owned by the same company. One says so on its site and the other does not, which is most of the story.
Comparison


Private Internet Access vs TunnelBear
Both cover unlimited devices and both kill switches leaked. Private Internet Access does far more; TunnelBear is easier and never changes its price.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs CyberGhost
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and its apps are open. CyberGhost has streaming servers and a parent company it does not name.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs Private Internet Access
Both publish their source. One is Swiss with a free tier you can stay on; the other is American, cheaper over three years, and owned by Kape.