Two companies registered in the same country, both of which have had the no-logs question put to them by an institution rather than a reviewer, and both of which came out of it intact. That is rare enough that this comparison is worth more than the size of either company suggests.
A search and an injunction
In 2023 Swedish police searched Mullvad's servers under warrant and left with nothing. In 2020 a court demanded customer data from OVPN and it had none to give — it fought the injunction and won on exactly that basis.
Both stories are stronger than an audit, and only one of these companies has an audit as well. No independent examination of OVPN has ever been published; what it has instead is the court case, servers it builds and owns and runs without disks, and insurance carried specifically to fund defending a legal demand, which is a genuinely unusual thing to buy.
Mullvad adds four external reviews published between October 2025 and June 2026. Sweden is inside the fourteen-country intelligence agreement, so neither is helped by its address.
Who owns each of them now
This is where they separate. Mullvad VPN AB is registered in Gothenburg and independent. OVPN was acquired in May 2023 by an American group now trading as Point Wild, which sells several other VPN brands — including Hotspot Shield, a service with no independent audit at all and a kill switch that let unencrypted traffic past during a crash.
That does not undo the 2020 court case, which happened under the previous owner and remains true. It does mean the company answering a demand tomorrow is not the company that answered one then, and for a product whose entire argument is institutional resistance, that is the thing to weigh.
On the product, Mullvad asks for no email address and no password and takes cash; OVPN runs normal accounts. Mullvad allows five devices, OVPN four on the monthly plan. Mullvad's clients are open source and OVPN's are not. OVPN supports streaming, which Mullvad does not claim, and both have multi-hop, ad blocking and memory-only servers.
Which should you choose?
Choose Mullvad if independence and an anonymous signup matter, which for a service bought on this argument is most of it. Choose OVPN if the 2020 court case and the hardware it owns outright are what convince you, and the change of ownership does not.

Mullvad
Five euros a month at any term, and no account to speak of.

OVPN
Fought an information injunction in court and won on having no logs.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench used for most entries here. BleepingComputer recorded a 220 Mbps global download average in August 2023 on a 5 Gbps test line, and that figure is now three years old
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
Mullvad
OVPN
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Mullvad or OVPN.
Comparison


Mullvad vs Windscribe
Neither asks for an email address. Mullvad holds almost nothing about you; Windscribe removes the device limit and does more with the connection.
Comparison


AirVPN vs OVPN
Neither has ever been independently audited. One publishes a live server monitor; the other fought a court order in 2020 and had nothing to hand over.
Comparison


Surfshark vs Mullvad
Surfshark covers every device you own; Mullvad stops at five. Mullvad's price does not move and Surfshark's roughly doubles at renewal.
Comparison


IVPN vs OVPN
IVPN takes no email address and never raises its price. OVPN fought a court order in 2020 and had no data to give. Neither has a current audit.
Comparison


Mullvad vs PureVPN
Mullvad was raided and had nothing to hand over. PureVPN supplied a customer's connection records to the FBI in 2017 while advertising no logs.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs Mullvad
Proton VPN is free to start and sits outside the intelligence groupings. Mullvad knows less about you. Which matters more depends on what you are protecting.