Both of these are small, quiet services with a real argument and a thin evidence file. Neither has a current independent audit of its no-logs claim, and each substitutes something different for one.
An anonymous account against a court case
IVPN's account is a random number with no email address and no password, it takes cash, and every client is open source. What it does not have is recent examination: Cure53's May 2025 audit covered the email and DNS side services, the gateways were last looked at in February 2023, and the no-logs claim itself was last examined by an outside firm in 2019.
OVPN's argument is what happened when it was tested. In 2020 a court demanded customer data and it had none to give, and it won the case on that basis. It builds and owns its servers and runs them without disks, and carries insurance specifically to fund defending a legal demand.
A demand that arrived and went away empty is the stronger evidence. IVPN's structure means a demand would probably go the same way, but that has not been put to the test.
Ownership, and what it changes
IVPN Limited is registered in Gibraltar and wholly owned by its founder. Gibraltar is inside the five-country arrangement through Britain but has no interception law and no intelligence service of its own, which makes it a stranger address than it first appears rather than a worse one.
OVPN was acquired in May 2023 by an American group now trading as Point Wild, which sells several other VPN brands including Hotspot Shield, a service with no audit at all and a kill switch that leaked during a crash. Sweden is inside the fourteen-country agreement. The 2020 case stands, but the company behind it changed hands three years later.
On product, IVPN puts multi-hop on its cheapest plan, never raises the price at renewal, sells by the week, and adds a SOCKS5 proxy and IPv6 protection. It caps the entry plan at five devices and has no port forwarding. OVPN allows four devices on the monthly plan, supports streaming, and runs memory-only servers.
Which should you choose?
Choose IVPN if signing up without an identity is the point, or if you want a company owned by the person running it and a price that stays fixed.
Choose OVPN if a real court case outweighs an anonymous signup, and you can set aside the change of owner since.

IVPN
No email address, no upsells, and public arguments against its own industry.

OVPN
Fought an information injunction in court and won on having no logs.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench used for most entries here. BleepingComputer recorded a 220 Mbps global download average in August 2023 on a 5 Gbps test line, and that figure is now three years old
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
IVPN
OVPN
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving IVPN or OVPN.
Comparison


Mullvad vs IVPN
The two services that refuse to ask who you are. They differ on what an outsider has actually examined, and on how many devices you get.
Comparison


Mullvad vs OVPN
Two Swedish services whose no-logs claims were both tested for real — one by a police search, the other in court. Neither lost anything.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs IVPN
Both publish their source and argue against their own industry's marketing. IVPN needs no email address; Proton VPN has been audited five years running.
Comparison


AirVPN vs OVPN
Neither has ever been independently audited. One publishes a live server monitor; the other fought a court order in 2020 and had nothing to hand over.
Comparison


IVPN vs AirVPN
Two small European services that take no email address and sell by the week. Neither has a current audit; one has never had any audit at all.