Both of these ask for very little money if you prepay, because each covers two years or more in a single charge. They arrive at the low price by different routes, and one of those routes has a documented cost.
The 2017 case, and what stands behind each claim
In 2017 PureVPN supplied a customer's connection records to the FBI while advertising a no-logs policy. Four assessments have followed, the most recent in February 2023, and the pages describing it no longer name the firm that carried it out.
Windscribe has no such episode. Its clients are open source, so the software's behaviour can be checked by anyone, and it asks for no email address and no password at signup — you can be protected without the service knowing who you are, which is a structural answer rather than a promised one. Its weakness is currency: the last outside server review was June 2024 and is past the two-year mark.
Jurisdiction runs against Windscribe. PureVPN is a British Virgin Islands company outside every intelligence-sharing agreement; Windscribe is in Ontario, inside the five-country one. That is the strongest thing PureVPN has here, and it is worth weighing honestly rather than dismissing.
What each low price includes
Windscribe renews at the rate it charged, places no cap on simultaneous devices including on its free plan, and lets you assemble a plan by location. Port forwarding, multi-hop, ad blocking and streaming are all included.
PureVPN's lowest rate needs a twenty-seven-month prepayment, allows ten devices, and sells port forwarding and a dedicated address on top of the subscription. It includes ad blocking, obfuscation, IPv6 protection and streaming, and ships apps down to Apple TV and Fire TV, which Windscribe lacks.
Windscribe is quick. PureVPN's speed has not been measured on the bench the other entries here use; the independent figure available puts it around a fifth slower, having been considerably worse two years earlier.
Which should you choose?
Choose Windscribe unless you need television apps or the British Virgin Islands address specifically. It is cheaper across the whole term, gives more away for free, publishes its source, and has nothing on its record to explain.
Choose PureVPN if apps on a television at the lowest prepaid rate is the requirement, and you have read the 2017 case and decided the years since have answered it.

Windscribe
Unlimited devices, no email needed, and a plan you assemble yourself.

PureVPN
Cheap on a long term, assessed four times, and none of them recently.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench the other entries use. AllAboutCookies recorded a 20% average loss in August 2026, having recorded far worse for the same service two years earlier
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
Windscribe
PureVPN
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Windscribe or PureVPN.
Comparison


Windscribe vs TunnelBear
Two Canadian services with unlimited devices and free plans, and completely opposite ideas about how much the person using them should have to understand.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs PureVPN
Both are registered in the British Virgin Islands. One is the quickest connection you can buy; the other handed a customer's records to the FBI in 2017.
Comparison


Mullvad vs Windscribe
Neither asks for an email address. Mullvad holds almost nothing about you; Windscribe removes the device limit and does more with the connection.
Comparison


NordVPN vs PureVPN
PureVPN is cheaper on a long prepayment and gave a customer's connection records to the FBI in 2017. NordVPN has been audited six times since.
Comparison


Private Internet Access vs Windscribe
Both publish their source and cover unlimited devices. Windscribe needs no email address and its kill switch holds; Private Internet Access leaked.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs PureVPN
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and publishes its source. PureVPN's last assessment was 2023 and it no longer names the firm.