These two compete for the same reader: somebody who wants a VPN, does not want to think about it much, and is choosing on price. Both prices are real and both are temporary. What separates them is which corners each one cut.
Two cheap headline rates, two different catches
Surfshark's advertised rate covers twenty-seven months and then roughly doubles. CyberGhost bills one charge covering twenty-six months and then a second covering twelve, which is a different shape of surprise but the same surprise. Neither is unusual in this market and neither is a reason to pick one over the other.
CyberGhost has been owned by Kape Technologies since 2017 and does not mention it anywhere on its site. Kape owns two other VPNs sold as separate brands. Surfshark's ownership is a matter of public record and its site does not hide it.
What each one does about IPv6
Surfshark does not support IPv6 and advises disabling it on your network. CyberGhost protects it. This sounds technical and is not: it means one of these asks you to switch off part of your connection so the privacy tool works, and the other does not.
They also break differently on protective features. Surfshark's kill switch allowed traffic through after a restart under testing. CyberGhost's kill switch holds but it has no obfuscation at all, so any network filtering VPN traffic will stop it — Surfshark's obfuscation works.
Surfshark's advantages are unlimited devices and multi-hop, neither of which CyberGhost offers. CyberGhost's are streaming servers chosen per service and a Smart DNS for televisions that cannot run an app.
Which should you choose?
Choose CyberGhost if the job is streaming to a television on an unfiltered home connection, and you want IPv6 handled rather than disabled. Pick Surfshark if you need to cover an unlimited number of devices or you might be on a network that blocks VPNs, and you will check the kill switch yourself after a restart.
If neither set of compromises appeals, that is a reasonable conclusion. Both are priced to be chosen quickly, and the cost of choosing quickly here is a feature that does not do what its name says.

Surfshark
Unlimited devices at a low rate that does not stay low.

CyberGhost
Long terms, a Deloitte report, and a parent company it never mentions.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench used for most entries here; AllAboutCookies recorded an 18% average loss across four regions in January 2026, which ranks it alongside the middle of the field
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
Surfshark
CyberGhost
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Surfshark or CyberGhost.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs Surfshark
Surfshark costs less and covers every device you own. ExpressVPN has a kill switch that holds, which is the part Surfshark got wrong.
Comparison


NordVPN vs CyberGhost
CyberGhost is cheaper and has more streaming servers. NordVPN can hide that you are using a VPN at all, and says who owns it.
Comparison


NordVPN vs Surfshark
Two services with the same parent company, compared on audit currency, kill-switch behaviour and what each actually charges after the first term.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs CyberGhost
These are sold as competitors and owned by the same company. One says so on its site and the other does not, which is most of the story.
Comparison


Surfshark vs IPVanish
Both cover unlimited devices at a low first-year rate. One has a kill switch that leaked; the other has a logging disclosure on the public record.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs CyberGhost
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and its apps are open. CyberGhost has streaming servers and a parent company it does not name.