These two are the closest pair on this site that nobody markets against each other. Both publish open-source clients, both remove the device limit, both are cheap over a long term, and both are registered inside the five-country intelligence agreement. The differences are small in number and large in effect.
The switch, and whether it survived a reboot
Private Internet Access's kill switch allowed traffic through after a restart under testing. Windscribe's held. This is the feature whose failure you cannot observe — the exposure lands in the seconds after a reconnection you did not notice — so a lab finding matters more here than it does on a feature you would spot failing.
Everything else in the feature comparison is close to a draw. Both have port forwarding, multi-hop, ad blocking, obfuscation, servers running from memory and no cap on simultaneous connections. Private Internet Access adds a SOCKS5 proxy and Windscribe does not; Windscribe supports streaming and Private Internet Access does not claim it.
Signing up, and staying signed up
Windscribe asks for no email address and no password. You can be protected without telling the service who you are, and it accepts cash. Private Internet Access wants a normal account. Windscribe also lets you buy only the countries you use rather than a bundle, and covers unlimited devices on its free plan as well as the paid one — Private Internet Access has no free tier.
Both renew at the rate they charged, so neither punishes you later, which is rarer than it should be.
On evidence they diverge. Deloitte has inspected Private Internet Access three times, most recently October 2025, and it has been asked for records in court more than once and produced nothing — the strongest form this evidence takes. Windscribe's last outside server review was Packetlabs in June 2024, past the two-year mark. Private Internet Access is owned by Kape Technologies, which sells two other VPNs as separate brands; Windscribe Limited is owned by nobody else.
Which should you choose?
Choose Windscribe if you want to sign up without an identity, a kill switch that behaves, or a plan assembled by location. Choose Private Internet Access if a court-tested no-logs claim and a current audit outweigh a protective feature that a lab could not get to hold.
Both are unusually good value and the loser here is still better than most of this directory.

Private Internet Access
Open-source apps, unlimited devices, and a US address.

Windscribe
Unlimited devices, no email needed, and a plan you assemble yourself.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
Private Internet Access
Windscribe
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Private Internet Access or Windscribe.
Comparison


Private Internet Access vs IPVanish
Two United States services whose no-logs promises were both tested by real legal demands. One produced nothing. The other produced records.
Comparison


Windscribe vs TunnelBear
Two Canadian services with unlimited devices and free plans, and completely opposite ideas about how much the person using them should have to understand.
Comparison


Private Internet Access vs TunnelBear
Both cover unlimited devices and both kill switches leaked. Private Internet Access does far more; TunnelBear is easier and never changes its price.
Comparison


Mullvad vs Windscribe
Neither asks for an email address. Mullvad holds almost nothing about you; Windscribe removes the device limit and does more with the connection.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs Private Internet Access
Both publish their source. One is Swiss with a free tier you can stay on; the other is American, cheaper over three years, and owned by Kape.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs Windscribe
Two free plans that are genuinely plans rather than trials. One is Swiss and audited five years running; the other is Canadian and covers every device.