Both of these have had their no-logs claim meet the real world. That is unusual, and it is the reason to put them side by side — the outcomes could hardly be further apart.
Nothing on file against a file that was handed over
In 2023 Swedish police searched Mullvad's servers under warrant and left with nothing, because there was nothing to take. Registration asks for no email address and sets no password, the account is a randomly generated number, and payment can be made in cash through the post or in Monero.
In 2017 PureVPN supplied a customer's connection records to the FBI while advertising a no-logs policy. Its fourth assessment ran in February 2023 and the pages describing it no longer name the firm that carried it out. The current policy names the specific record categories it says it does not keep, which is more precise than the industry norm, but precision in a policy is not the same as having nothing to produce.
Four external reviews of Mullvad were published between October 2025 and June 2026, covering the Android app, a WireGuard implementation and the payment and account backend. On jurisdiction PureVPN is better placed — the British Virgin Islands is outside every intelligence-sharing agreement, where Sweden is inside the fourteen-country one — which is exactly the case for not treating jurisdiction as the answer.
Paying once a month against prepaying two years
Mullvad charges five euros a month at one month and at ten years, with no auto-renewal: the balance runs down and you top it up. PureVPN's lowest rate requires a twenty-seven-month prepayment, and port forwarding and a dedicated address are sold on top of it.
PureVPN allows ten simultaneous devices against Mullvad's five, and ships apps down to Apple TV and Fire TV where Mullvad has nothing for a television. It also has streaming support and IPv6 protection, neither of which Mullvad claims.
Mullvad answers with open-source clients, servers running from memory, multi-hop, ad blocking and a SOCKS5 proxy. Its speed measures well on the bench the other entries use; PureVPN has not been measured on it.
Which should you choose?
Choose Mullvad if the no-logs claim is what you are actually buying, and five devices is enough. It is the strongest evidence in this directory and PureVPN's is the weakest.
Choose PureVPN if you need television apps or ten devices at the lowest possible prepaid rate, and the 2017 case does not change your mind.

Mullvad
Five euros a month at any term, and no account to speak of.

PureVPN
Cheap on a long term, assessed four times, and none of them recently.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench the other entries use. AllAboutCookies recorded a 20% average loss in August 2026, having recorded far worse for the same service two years earlier
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
Mullvad
PureVPN
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Mullvad or PureVPN.
Comparison


Mullvad vs Windscribe
Neither asks for an email address. Mullvad holds almost nothing about you; Windscribe removes the device limit and does more with the connection.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs PureVPN
Both are registered in the British Virgin Islands. One is the quickest connection you can buy; the other handed a customer's records to the FBI in 2017.
Comparison


Mullvad vs OVPN
Two Swedish services whose no-logs claims were both tested for real — one by a police search, the other in court. Neither lost anything.
Comparison


NordVPN vs PureVPN
PureVPN is cheaper on a long prepayment and gave a customer's connection records to the FBI in 2017. NordVPN has been audited six times since.
Comparison


Surfshark vs Mullvad
Surfshark covers every device you own; Mullvad stops at five. Mullvad's price does not move and Surfshark's roughly doubles at renewal.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs PureVPN
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and publishes its source. PureVPN's last assessment was 2023 and it no longer names the firm.