There is no polite way to open this one. Both of these companies advertised a no-logs policy, were asked for a customer's data by a law enforcement agency, and supplied it. IPVanish in 2016, PureVPN in 2017. Almost nothing else in this directory has one such episode, and these two have one each.
Two disclosures, and what has changed since
IPVanish received a Homeland Security summons in 2016, replied that it kept no usage information, and then supplied a subscriber's name, email address, home IP address and connection times. It has changed hands twice since, and Schellman Compliance examined the no-logs claim in February 2025 — recent and by a named firm, though the report sits behind a customer login.
PureVPN supplied a customer's connection records to the FBI in 2017. Its most recent assessment ran in February 2023, and its pages no longer name the firm that carried it out. Its current policy does name the specific record categories it says it does not keep, which is more precise than the industry norm.
So the difference is currency and attribution. IPVanish's evidence is two years fresher and has a firm's name on it. PureVPN's is older and has had a name removed from it. Neither is the same company it was, and neither claim has been tested again by a real demand.
Where each one is actually better
IPVanish places no cap on simultaneous devices where PureVPN allows ten, and adds multi-hop, which PureVPN lacks. Both ship apps down to Apple TV and Fire TV, both have obfuscation, ad blocking and IPv6 protection.
PureVPN's kill switch holds. IPVanish has no first-party Linux app at all. Neither runs servers from memory and neither publishes client source.
Jurisdiction favours PureVPN: a British Virgin Islands company outside every intelligence agreement, against a Florida company applying California law inside the five-country one. On price PureVPN is cheaper on a long prepayment, while IPVanish charges far more after the first year.
Which should you choose?
Choose IPVanish if a recent, named audit is what would reassure you, and you need unlimited devices. Choose PureVPN if jurisdiction and the lower long-term price matter more, and a kill switch that holds is worth the older evidence.
The honest recommendation is neither. Both asked to be trusted, were tested, and failed — and this directory contains services that were tested and did not.

IPVanish
Every device you own at once, and a logging case it still answers for.

PureVPN
Cheap on a long term, assessed four times, and none of them recently.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench the other entries use. AllAboutCookies recorded a 20% average loss in August 2026, having recorded far worse for the same service two years earlier
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
IPVanish
PureVPN
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving IPVanish or PureVPN.
Comparison


Private Internet Access vs IPVanish
Two United States services whose no-logs promises were both tested by real legal demands. One produced nothing. The other produced records.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs PureVPN
Both are registered in the British Virgin Islands. One is the quickest connection you can buy; the other handed a customer's records to the FBI in 2017.
Comparison


NordVPN vs IPVanish
IPVanish told a US agency it kept no records and then supplied them. NordVPN has six audits and a renewal price that more than triples.
Comparison


NordVPN vs PureVPN
PureVPN is cheaper on a long prepayment and gave a customer's connection records to the FBI in 2017. NordVPN has been audited six times since.
Comparison


IPVanish vs TunnelBear
Both cover unlimited devices and both kill switches leaked under testing. IPVanish reaches televisions; TunnelBear does far less and costs the same yearly.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs PureVPN
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and publishes its source. PureVPN's last assessment was 2023 and it no longer names the firm.