Before anything else about these two: Kape Technologies owns both. They are marketed as alternatives to each other, they appear side by side in the same round-ups, and a reader weighing them believes they are weighing two companies. ExpressVPN acknowledges the ownership. CyberGhost's site does not mention it.
One parent company, two brands
This does not make either product unsafe, and it is not a reason on its own to avoid them. It is a reason to stop treating the pair as a second opinion. If your process was to shortlist several VPNs and pick the one that came up twice, this is the shortlist failing quietly, and it is worth knowing before rather than after.
It also frames the audits. CyberGhost's Deloitte report is limited assurance covering the servers on 31 October 2025; ExpressVPN's KPMG review covered a single day in February 2025. Two narrow reports commissioned under one owner is less corroboration than two reports from two companies.
Streaming servers against a quicker tunnel
Where they actually differ is what each is built to do. CyberGhost sells servers chosen for particular streaming services and a Smart DNS for televisions and consoles that cannot run an app, and it protects IPv6. If the job is watching something on a device that will not install software, that is a real advantage.
ExpressVPN is the quicker connection, and it has obfuscation that works without configuration — CyberGhost has none at all, so any network that blocks VPN traffic blocks CyberGhost. Neither offers port forwarding, and CyberGhost has no multi-hop. Both run their servers from memory with nothing written to disk, so on the question people most often ask about server hygiene there is nothing to choose between them.
Which should you choose?
Choose ExpressVPN if you want speed and you might ever be on a network that filters VPNs. Choose CyberGhost if a television is the device you care about and your connection is not filtered.
The better question is whether you want either. If the reason you were comparing them was to get a second opinion, you have not got one, and the sensible next step is to compare one of them against a company with a single product and a published owner.
ExpressVPN
The quickest connection you can buy, at the steepest renewal.
CyberGhost
Long terms, a Deloitte report, and a parent company it never mentions.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench used for most entries here; AllAboutCookies recorded an 18% average loss across four regions in January 2026, which ranks it alongside the middle of the field
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
ExpressVPN
CyberGhost
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving ExpressVPN or CyberGhost.
Comparison
NordVPN vs ExpressVPN
Both cost about the same and both renew at roughly triple. What separates them is how much of each no-logs claim an outside firm has checked.
Comparison
NordVPN vs CyberGhost
CyberGhost is cheaper and has more streaming servers. NordVPN can hide that you are using a VPN at all, and says who owns it.
Comparison
ExpressVPN vs PureVPN
Both are registered in the British Virgin Islands. One is the quickest connection you can buy; the other handed a customer's records to the FBI in 2017.
Comparison
Proton VPN vs CyberGhost
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and its apps are open. CyberGhost has streaming servers and a parent company it does not name.
Comparison
ExpressVPN vs Proton VPN
ExpressVPN is the quicker connection by a clear margin. Proton VPN is the one whose apps you can read and whose free tier never expires.
Comparison
CyberGhost vs Private Internet Access
Kape Technologies owns both of these, and only one of them says so. Private Internet Access also publishes every line of its client source.