Neither of these is trying to be the most capable VPN available, which makes the comparison a question of which set of omissions you can live with rather than which is better.
Two narrow products, narrow in different places
CyberGhost is built around streaming: servers picked for particular services, a Smart DNS for televisions and consoles that cannot run an app, ad blocking and IPv6 protection. What it lacks is obfuscation, multi-hop and port forwarding — and the missing obfuscation means any network filtering VPN traffic stops CyberGhost outright.
TunnelBear has obfuscation, so it gets through those networks, and no cap on simultaneous devices including on its free plan. What it lacks is nearly everything else: no multi-hop, no ad blocking, no port forwarding, no Linux app, nothing for a television, and support pages saying that regional blocks are not something it works at.
So one covers the living room and fails on filtered connections; the other survives filtered connections and cannot reach the living room at all. Very few readers need both, which is what makes this decidable.
Owners, named and unnamed
CyberGhost has been owned by Kape Technologies since 2017 and its site does not mention it, while Kape sells two other VPNs as independent brands. TunnelBear has been owned by McAfee since 2018 and says so, though it runs from Toronto under Canadian law while the entity in the contract is a Delaware company.
On inspection TunnelBear has the longer record — Cure53 most years since 2017 — but no report was published for the 2024 audit, and an independent lab found its kill switch leaks after a reboot and after a crash. CyberGhost's Deloitte report is limited assurance covering the servers on 31 October 2025, which is one date rather than a period, and its kill switch holds.
Jurisdiction favours CyberGhost: Romania is outside every intelligence-sharing agreement, Canada is inside the five-country one. Price roughly ties — TunnelBear's yearly plan renews at what it charged, CyberGhost bills twenty-six months and then twelve.
Which should you choose?
Choose CyberGhost if streaming to a television is the job, your connection is not filtered, and you can set aside an owner the site does not name. Choose TunnelBear if the connection might be filtered, you need unlimited devices, and a very short feature list is genuinely enough.
If both sets of gaps look too wide, Windscribe covers the ground both of these miss and costs about the same.

CyberGhost
Long terms, a Deloitte report, and a parent company it never mentions.

TunnelBear
Built to be understood, and owned by McAfee since 2018.
Specs
Ratings
Speed
Not measured on the bench used for most entries here; AllAboutCookies recorded an 18% average loss across four regions in January 2026, which ranks it alongside the middle of the field
Privacy
Ease of use
Value
Features
Pricing
CyberGhost
TunnelBear
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving CyberGhost or TunnelBear.
Comparison


NordVPN vs CyberGhost
CyberGhost is cheaper and has more streaming servers. NordVPN can hide that you are using a VPN at all, and says who owns it.
Comparison


Private Internet Access vs TunnelBear
Both cover unlimited devices and both kill switches leaked. Private Internet Access does far more; TunnelBear is easier and never changes its price.
Comparison


ExpressVPN vs CyberGhost
These are sold as competitors and owned by the same company. One says so on its site and the other does not, which is most of the story.
Comparison


Windscribe vs TunnelBear
Two Canadian services with unlimited devices and free plans, and completely opposite ideas about how much the person using them should have to understand.
Comparison


Proton VPN vs CyberGhost
Proton VPN has been inspected five years running and its apps are open. CyberGhost has streaming servers and a parent company it does not name.
Comparison


IPVanish vs TunnelBear
Both cover unlimited devices and both kill switches leaked under testing. IPVanish reaches televisions; TunnelBear does far less and costs the same yearly.